[AdGuard for Windows] v6.1.296 R4 release candidate
- Thread starter vasily_bagirov
- Start date
- Status
Okay, it seems to be more-or-less reproducible by using Chrome and Edge at the same time - load pages in both, close and reopen Edge and it eventually resets in Edge (and Chrome when you restart it). I was able to save HARs from Chrome and Edge. I'll PM you the links.
Should fix this! This is in chrome.
It's a warning about the security (https) of the page.
Where? I'm not seeing any warnings about this unless I look at the connection details (in Chrome's developer tools > Security section) on a HTTPS site.
This was kinda addressed in a single beta build a year or so ago (using a modern key exchange), but it caused an issue in Chrome where it'd cause HTTPS sites like Google and Google News to load very slowly and was reverted. @avatar is there any chance this could be attempted again? I'd like to see if the issue I noticed a year or so ago still exists when using a better key exchange.
Yes correct in Chrome's developer tools > Security section.
Got ya. Yea cant have that. Another attempt though would be great.
Open an issue for tracking @ https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardForWindows/issues perhaps ?
Got ya. Yea cant have that. Another attempt though would be great.
Open an issue for tracking @ https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardForWindows/issues perhaps ?
If a $replace rule is active with important, normal url block rules are not active anymore it seems.
Had a $replace on overclockers.ru and advert.js was not blocked until I disabled $replace.
The searched patterns were not even active on the site anymore and Adguard still applied the $replace rule and therefore disabled url blocking rules. Behaviour should be modified.
Had a $replace on overclockers.ru and advert.js was not blocked until I disabled $replace.
The searched patterns were not even active on the site anymore and Adguard still applied the $replace rule and therefore disabled url blocking rules. Behaviour should be modified.
http://winfuture.de/news,95280.html
It seems [-ext-has=''] doesn't check deeper the DOM tree when it encounters an iframe.
To hide "Interessante Android-Bücher" normally the following rule should work, but isn't.
winfuture.de###centerRightWrap > #rightWrap > .rightBx[-ext-has='div.amzwgt']
I had to put "iframe" into -ext-has field to make it work.
It seems [-ext-has=''] doesn't check deeper the DOM tree when it encounters an iframe.
To hide "Interessante Android-Bücher" normally the following rule should work, but isn't.
winfuture.de###centerRightWrap > #rightWrap > .rightBx[-ext-has='div.amzwgt']
I had to put "iframe" into -ext-has field to make it work.
HAR files you PMed me didn't contain any useful information, unfortunately. I don't know what can be done, maybe a remote control session? I don't remember your stance on this
That's true, looking inside of an iframe may be restricted by security policy.
And way to disable it?
This does not mean it is necessarily restricted - but it is enough of a reason that we don't implement such a look-inside.
Starchild1976
Beta Tester
this release runs smooth on both comodo dragon and comodo ice dragon , but it is a lot slower on edge , page rendering takes quite some time.
No issues here. What antivirus/antimalware application(s) are you using, if any?
Starchild1976
Beta Tester
Comodo internet security 10 at this moment. ( I did disable that driver thingy in adguard )
)
Starchild1976
Beta Tester
OK Thanks for clearing that up. Edge is just my backup browser , so it is no biggie for me. the other two comodo browsers are fine with adguard and run snappy!!
the other two comodo browsers are fine with adguard and run snappy!!
- Status