Hi there I'm living in Europe and Adguard chose to use a DNS Server from Japan.
Why the long way from home when you got 4 Server in Europe that would be way closer?
7.5 Beta 1
Routes are distributed on the BGP principle.
Apparently, for some reason, ping is considered closer to Japan than to European servers.
Try re-connecting the DNS, will there be any changes?
Try re-connecting the DNS, will there be any changes? Sadly no
From all the available DNS Servers only Adguard choose Japan. The others found Servers in my country or a few hundred miles away. Adguard was the only one chosing a country thousands of miles away.
Fun fact even Adguard DNS changed from the Netherlands to Japan a few days before I tried this new beta.
@myMoon Any idea why of all the servers to choose from only Adguard thinks a server which is a few thousand miles away is faster than 4 servers close by? E.g. Google, Quad, Open DNS each chose a server in my country or only a few hundred miles away. Not Adguard.
this week I was in Indonesia always getting the DNS adguard server in the Seoul (SE) region, before I always got the DNS adguard server in the Singapore region (SG), the location closest to my country.
I'm glad to hear that, latency is getting better again.
however, routing to DNS adguard still seems to have problems on one of the routes. Here I attach a traceroute comparison of the 3 available public DNS providers.
I'm seeing the same but (so far) only with one website (iherb.com) that always redirects me to the Japan domain (https://jp.iherb.com/) instead of the Australian one (https://au.iherb.com). I'm using AG VPN and AGH DNS
Was this me in Japan? Nope, it was me in Australia using the Sydney VPN option in AG VPN!
C'mon AG folks - this is not OK and you can't just blame it on BCP and wash your hands of it.